Can Technology Control The Brain?

Can Technology Control The Brain?

The interesting fact about the human brain is it is not fully grown until the human being turns twenty-five years! The question here is whether can technology control the brain? This is indeed a very important question. The human brain is the most important organ of the human body. More than a hundred billion neurons make up the human brain, and each cell is more powerful than a supercomputer. 

Yet, a great scientist like Albert Einstein has used only 17.4% of his brain\’s potential. Where does that leave ordinary people like us? The human brain is similar to the hard disk, which can consist of and carry any amount of information or data. While a hard disk has its limitations, our brain does not.

\"Technology

There is no limit to the capacity of the brain. The more we remember, the more we can remember! Memory is history recorded in our brain; whatever we experience with our senses is stored as a mental image and recorded in the brain, part of our nervous system. It is the most complex and center part of the human organ system.

Mind control or brain control is one of the biggest practices done by people. Since our childhood, our parents have often taught us and led us ways to control our thoughts and emotions and keep them in check. Our brain does all these actions.

Mind is the mental reference, whereas the brain is the physical form of the mind. Scientifically, the brain gives our body signals to move in the desired direction, and our brain controls the system, but can we have control over our brain? YES, it is possible with technology. Feelings and desires can be considered top affecting factors to influence our brains. We want our brains according to what we desire and need. Technology plays a huge role in bringing this change.

Making use of his brain, a man has been able to invent things that can function better than his brain. With the passage of his time, man has invented wonders and super-wonders. First, he has successfully invented the radio, wireless, the telephone, television, the airplane, rockets, etc. Then, he invented the calculator for gathering his required information, and later, he invented the computer.

Technology To Control The Thoughts

Now, these technologies have become the driving force in changing people\’s minds! They have begun to read and control our brains with the help of technology. Many research programs have been conducted and tested to do brain control artificially and its functions to keep it in our possession. Though there were applauds to the idea, many did not support the process.

Extremely rich people, Elon Musk of Tesla and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, are driving the charge, emptying many dollars into creating cerebrum PC interface (BCI) innovation. Musk says he needs to give a \”genius layer\” in the human cerebrum to assist with shielding us from man-made consciousness. Zuckerberg purportedly needs clients to transfer their musings and feelings over the web without the trouble of composing. Yet, reality and fiction are effortlessly obscured in these considerations. So, how does this innovation function, and what is it prepared to do?

\"human

In 1964, Delgado\’s innovation could incite an amazing measure of control in human minds. Essentially by stimulating embedded terminals, he could subdue a furious talk mid-seizure or stifle psychological instabilities in a moment — yet he could likewise order an individual\’s appendages to move, overpower an individual with sexual rapture or dive them into profound, self-destructive gloom. No big surprise individuals got anxious with regards to this innovation.

Indeed, even as of late, broadly regarded neuroscientists have sounded the caution. A preventative publication, distributed in 2017 in Nature, opens with a scene that might have been found in an episode of Black Mirror, a show whose plots frequently focus on mind control innovation. The neuroscientists portray a situation wherein a mind embed that empowers a deadened man to control a prosthetic arm abruptly goes haywire because the man feels baffled. It assaults a colleague with its steely paws.

ARE MACHINES EATING UP OUR BRAINS?

The present BCI gadgets work by examining information, similar to what Amazon attempts to anticipate what book you may need straightaway. PCs observing surges of electrical action, got by a cerebrum embed or a removable cathode cap, figure out how to perceive how the traffic design changes when an individual makes a planned appendage development.

For instance, the continuous motions in electrical action flooding through the cerebral cortex, known as mind waves, are out of nowhere smothered when an individual maneuvers an appendage — or even ponders moving it.

This peculiarity mirrors an unexpected change in correspondence among a huge number of neurons, similar to the abrupt quiet in an eatery after a server drops a glass: You can\’t comprehend discussions between individual coffee shops. However, the aggregate quiet is a reasonable sign.

Researchers can use the break-in electrical rush hour gridlock in the cerebral cortex to trigger a PC to enact an engine in a prosthetic arm or click a virtual mouse on a PC screen. However, in any event, when it is feasible to take advantage of a singular neuron with microelectrodes, neuroscientists can\’t unravel its neuronal terminating as though it were such a lot of PC code; they need to utilize AI to perceive designs in the neuron\’s electrical movement that associate with a social reaction.

\"brain

Such BCIs work by connection, much as how we push down the grip in a vehicle by paying attention to the motor. Yet, there\’s more than extravagant innovation at work in BCI gadgets — the actual mind assumes an enormous part.

Through a delayed experimentation process, the cerebrum is in some way or compensated by seeing the expected reaction happen. Over the long run, it figures out how to create the electrical sign it realizes the PC will perceive. Every one of these happens underneath the degree of cognizance, and neuroscientists don\’t have the foggiest idea of how the mind achieves it. It\’s a very long way from the shocking feelings of trepidation and guarantees that go with the ghost of brain control.

Technology Control The Brain

The possibility of controlling the human psyche with mind embeds, and radio pillars lighted public apprehensions that diminished this line of exploration for quite a long time. However, presently there is a resurgence utilizing much further developed innovation and technology that can read and control our mind. Laser radiates, ultrasound, electromagnetic heartbeats, gently rotating and direct flow excitement, and different strategies currently permit admittance to, and control of, electrical movement in mind with undeniably more complexity than the needlelike cathodes Delgado cut into cerebrums.

In any case, one more encouraging sort of interface that up to this point has gotten less consideration is the brain-to-brain interface or BBI. A brain-to-brain interface records the signs in a single individual\’s brain. Afterward, it conveys these messages through a PC to send them into someone else\’s brain. This interaction permits the second individual to \”read\” the psyche of the first or, at the end of the day, have their brain fire in a comparative example to the first individual.

Back in 2013, the principal study in which two brains were effectively joined to work together and complete an assignment was distributed in Scientific Reports. In the first place, Miguel Pais-Vieira and his partners prepared rodents to play out a fundamental errand: the creatures were prepared to squeeze one of two switches, with the right switch motioned with a light.

The right decision gave them admittance to water. When the rodents could effectively do this job four out of multiple times, they were relegated as either the encoder-the one conveying messages or the decoder, the one getting them. Encoder rodents were precisely embedded with recording wires that deliberate movement in the motor region of their brain.

In contrast, decoder rodents were embedded with animating wires in a similar region. Everyone was kept in a different compartment, and just the encoder rodents were shown the light sign on the switches. As the encoder rodents picked a switch, neurons in their brain began terminating.

The BBI recorded this action, changed it, and utilized it to invigorate a comparable example into the brain of the decoder rodent. The decoder rodent needed to accurately press a switch in light of this feeling. (Water was possibly given, assuming the two creatures effectively pushed the right switch.) The scientists observed that the two rodents pushed the right switch 62% of the time or more than the possibility likelihood.

In a year, applications for this sort of gadget expanded. In November of 2014, the principal continuous BBI for people was created by Rajesh Rao and partners at the University of Washington. Not at all like the helpless rodents, the human gadget was harmless, which means a medical procedure wasn\’t needed.

This gadget moved the development signals from the encoder directly to the brain\’s motor region of the decoder without utilizing a PC. In the review, Rao and his group utilized electroencephalography (EEG), putting recording wires on the scalp of the encoding individual.

Then, at that point, the researchers utilized transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) on deciphering the individual\’s brain, sending minimal, attractive heartbeats through their skull to enact a particular district of their brain. This made the subsequent individual make the move that the principal individual intended, to-for instance, to press a button.

The decoder wasn\’t deliberately mindful of the sign they got. They couldn\’t effectively deal with the approaching neural data, meaning just development was moved, not considerations. All things considered, their hand essentially moved when animated, like a puppeteer was controlling their appendages.

In any case, currently, this area of exploration is bringing up moral issues. We should begin having discussions now about the ramifications of these gadgets before they reach the place where we can modify complex considerations. We want to begin thinking, for instance, regarding how we can plan this innovation to forestall undesirable musings being sent straightforwardly into our heads.

BRAIN WITH NO BARRIERS

In this way, there is a manual for further developing our brain\’s true capacity. These contraptions clearly can change how we confer and learn in light of everything. There\’s an amazing number of potential applications-essentially imagine broadening considerations in an enlightening environment, clearly conferring memories to other individuals, exchanging the necessity for phones or the Internet totally, or even, in the more close term, using it to show people newly organized capacities during rebuilding.

\"Technology

Simultaneously, we should likewise know and be cautious about the fixation that we may make with the utilization of innovation. For instance, a researcher did a fascinating trial with fish. He took two fish and set them in a vessel brimming with water. They were joyfully swimming all around the vessel. The researcher then kept a piece of glass in the middle of the two fish in the vessel. As the fish swam, they hit the glass and couldn\’t go past it.

After some time, when the researcher eliminated the glass, he observed that the fish were as yet not going past where the glass had been put, despite the fact that it was no longer there. The fish actually believed that the piece of glass was there. This is the psychological boundary that the fish has made.

Likewise, another test was finished with bugs in a container. Bugs don\’t remain still in any event, briefly. They continue to bounce all over. The individual testing set a cover on top of this container. After some time, when the cover was taken out, the bugs didn\’t leap out of the container. All things being equal, they were found hopping barely shy of the top since that was the degree to which they had the option to hop for quite a while.

What\’s more, since they had been utilized to that stature, they didn\’t bounce any higher in any event when the container was open. This sort of prohibitive reasoning is a colossal snag making progress toward progress. To counter this, we really want what is classified as \”out of the box\” or \”creative\” thinking.

So to ideally think, we should be creative and think out of the box. Advancement and innovativeness are the twin keys to achievement in any field. What\’s more, to be creative and inventive, one requirement is to break liberated from mental hindrances and innovative boundaries.

Follow Us On Youtube and Instagram

ALSO READ -: What Is The Future of Technology In India And The World?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *